The Appeal Court Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The pull Court - Research Paper ExampleThe appeal was based on the fact that the evidence send forth by the prosecution was not sufficient enough to prove him guilty and the decisiveness should be reversed in favor of the appellant. According to the case, the prosecution in the trial court postulated that both Jonathan Parker and Leroy Lewis were narcotics dealers and that Parker had killed his yoke Lewis because of his failure to share the robbed cocaine equally among themselves.The prosecution argued that Parker shot Lewis on his head after discovering that Lewis had lie about the total amount of narcotics stolen. The prosecution roped in three other drug dealers to strengthen their argument. On the other side, Jonathan Parker appealed that the evidence put forth by the government was not direct but a wrong inference which was deducted out of unrelated activities. His main defense points were that there was no eyewitness to turn out the shooting or to give any statements concer ning about the shooting. The prosecution also could not prove the coordinated of DNA or fingerprints nor the motive for the putting to death. They also failed to find or identify the weapon used for killing Lewis. The above case shows how the prosecution used circumstantial evidence to present their case. The appeals court, in this case, had to reverse the conclusiveness as this circumstantial evidence does not stand as absolute evidence against the appellant. The court decision must be based on concrete evidence which supports the conclusion of the inference drawn by the prosecution against the defendant.